[THE
BOSTON MURDERTHON: The
title way up above for this entry applies to the next section, but the Boston mayhem
occurred after I assumed everything was ready to go. There's not much to say, except I'm willing
to be crude enough to ask whether the government would classify this disaster
as "workplace violence," as it did the Fort Hood radical Islamic
jihad massacre. No, we don't know who is
responsible in Boston as I write this, and of course we offer our deepest
sympathies to the people and families involved in Boston. But I can't help thinking -- this week we
experienced the horror of bombs (again) in the USA, and just a few days ago a
bonkers college student slashed and sliced numerous people within an inch of
their lives on a campus, using a simple knife.
Yet, President Obama and willing state government mockingbirds have a
strange preference for turning millions of law-abiding citizens with
guns into a new untrustworthy class. In
the meantime, Mr. President, maybe you'd better take less expensive vacations
and spend a little less time at the golf course -- and maybe pass up a couple
of those elaborate White House concert sessions that sooth your Hollywood
friends and other members of the big money crowd who supported your
extravagancies -- and actually try to be a leader, instead of an orator
spouting blissful dreams saddled with crushing debt. Prez dude couldn't even use the word, terrorism,
during his brief initial speech, instantly urinating off everybody in Boston
who knew better, instantaneously, though by the next day his handlers made
certain to include the forbidden word -- forbidden since we were informed there
was no longer a war on terrorism per se.
Oopsie. You know, it's not merely
that the president is an empty suit when it comes to speeches. The problem is that the emperor has no
clothes. Period.
The thing is, this Administration
has failed us again, gambling away American lives within our borders, and now
we all may as well live in Benghazi.
Danger runs rampant while all those billions spent on "homeland
security" in the U.S. promise nothing except lots of spying on the
innocent. In no way should you surrender
your guns, and I say that as somebody who has no particular interest in guns --
but I demand the unencumbered, established right to have them if I wish. Unfortunately, this country currently
displays publicly a number of political thugs who pounced upon just the right
moment to emerge from their cockroach eggs to show us what they're made of, and
it's not a pretty sight.
Everything which follows was
written well in advance of the comments I made above, and obviously some of
this now seems watered down considerably:]
But the
electronic mainstream media continues to enjoy the firearm and murdered
children hoopla, and so it might because TV news ratings and TV viewing in
general maintain a steady decline. We
can no longer put our trust in the evening news, and because all major
news media in the USA now reportedly suffer and plod on under the thumb of less than a
dozen owners, the choices are almost universally bad because they are universally
manipulated.
Tents at the New
York State Fair concealed more than freak shows in the sixties
(see previous blog entry), and as a kid I also liked to spend some time in the
elephant tent with a bag of peanuts, watching majestic trunks descend to grasp
a favorite treat. I've not attended a
fair in years, but, like the "freak shows" which disappeared with the
times, I doubt that elephant exhibits are as carefree and open as they once
were, for the only thing between visitors and elephants then was a
"fence" composed of a waist-high rope running horizontally and
attached every few feet to little posts.
Yes, the elephants were chained at the ankles, so I suppose safety was
somewhat assured.
Yet, I felt
sorry for them, confined as they were on a concrete floor padded only with a
little straw or sawdust, and the inability to engage in typical elephant
activities must have been agonizing, because their boredom was obvious,
demonstrated by their constant side-to-side rocking motion where they
stood. What else could they do, besides
watch people gawk and feed them peanuts?
And now nearly
50 years
have passed, but the image of elephants has returned -- a terrifying image, as
reported by King Broadcasting Co. and other sources last month. Mass elephant slaughters for tusks of ivory
is nothing new, tragically, but this time the International Fund for Animal
Welfare disclosed that poachers in Chad killed 86, including pregnant females,
in less than a week, merely to take their ivory -- destined, as usual, mostly
for wealthy and influential Chinese bastards.
Criminal enterprises in both Asia and Africa have grown and expanded the
ivory "industry," and various nations -- particularly China -- have
been warned that decisive action must be taken to end the brutality and
attractive profit motive involved. As if
they care or ever did.
Which brings me
to talk show host and author Michael Savage.
Some of you may know him only from your friends or relatives whose
politics get in the way, causing them to tell you he's a monster, a madman, or
a bully, steeped in the tradition of talkers Joe Pyne or Morton Downey,
Jr. Actually, that's what I expected,
too, when I first encountered him a few years ago on talk radio. However, if you hang in there with him for a
few days or weeks, you begin to realize that, despite all of his sarcasm, anger
and tendency to be rude or short with callers, this is a man with both a brain
and a heart. Currently broadcasting
evenings Monday through Friday from San Francisco, Savage is no ignorant
lightweight. Indeed, he grew up on the
mean streets of New York City -- about which he tells some great stories and
has written of them in his books -- and, despite the odds, managed to rack up a
Ph.D and two master's degrees.
Savage is a
strict conservative, with perhaps just a trace of libertarianism poking
through, espousing, to say the least, no love for either the Republicans or the
Democrats. What particularly impresses
me, though, is his love of animals. He
and his poodle, Teddy, are shown above.
What one may not anticipate about Savage, however, is his deep love for
the world's elephants -- and his marked hatred for the poachers, whom he
believes should be shot dead where they stand.
Michael Savage,
big ol' brute Savage -- did you know he donates thousands of dollars to protect
elephants and pay for intercepting poachers before they have a chance to slowly
and agonizingly murder the world's pachyderms?
Yet, despite such good deeds, he was banned from England because they
apparently don't like his politics (though Great Britain seems to have no
problems allowing radical Islamism into the country). He's also contributed monetarily, and
apparently handsomely, to help defray legal expenses for U.S. military
personnel who served in the Middle East, now either facing or already residing
in prison because our government put them there. Which doesn't necessarily mean one belongs
there.
Having just published
his second spy novel, Savage was already the author of numerous books about the
sciences, based upon his education and experiences internationally. Love him or hate him, Michael sugarcoats
nothing and lays his often brash opinions on the line during his show,
"The Savage Nation." And, yep
-- he loves the critters, so don't be put off by what frequently seems a harsh
exterior. I suspect that this friend to
animals is really a pussycat in disguise.*
When one hand
neglects to wash the other, what happens?
The number of people with autism, dementia and Alzheimer's is reportedly
rising, creating a real problem as years go by -- in no small part because
there may not be enough younger folk to care for them. So we wonder, if this is what it all comes down
to, will the Alzheimer's sufferers care for the autistic, or the autistic for
the Alzheimer's patients? Or will
dispassionate robots be in charge before a crisis occurs? What about those radio commercials selling
food that lasts for 25 years in case of a disaster? In 25 years, neither the dementia-ridden,
Alzheimer's-afflicted or autistic may have the ability even to know there's
food in those pouches, let alone know how to open the packages. That's the real disaster, I should think.
CLINTON, BUSH, CLINTON,
BUSH, CLINTON, BUSH: Um, for one thing, Hillary already tried to
run for prez, and that didn't work out at all well. Then there's her history as secretary of
state -- solidified during the Benghazi catastrophe and her remarkable failure
in trying to solve the world's ills as secretary. Not to be obvious, but isn't there anybody in
America who could run with a fresh face and not be named Clinton or Bush or
Kennedy? Enough already.
Remember the
Alamo? Well, don't bother. By virtue of immigration "reform"
being constructed by the "Gang of 8," because your opinion doesn't
matter anymore, history books will need a rewrite. Clearly, a substantial portion of Mexico's
border jumpers will "inherit" a considerable amount of American real
estate -- and American taxpayers will continue to foot a rather hefty
bill. The Alamo? Took a long time, but Mexico apparently won
that war after all. Secure the
borders? That's a funny one.
May I be so
foolish as to suggest the creation of a new political party? Everybody's heard of the GOP, but how about
the creation of a new political party,
the GOPP -- the Grand Old :Prison Party? Prisons, of course, have been around
forever, but so have lots and lots of politicians and banker buddies who should
be confined within prison walls but, strangely, never quite make it that far
because of power, influence and big money.
That needs to change. Vote for
the GOPP.
SUBSCRIPTION
RENEWAL REMINDER: Readers, your annual renewals to this blog
are now due, and you may send your payments to. . .wait a minute. . .!!!. .
.Well! Now I know why I'm not making any
money off this thing! Oh, never
mind. Obviously, sometimes literary
brilliance comes free of charge. . .
WHAT DRIVES ME
NUTS: Lots of things, but recently I've become even
more upset with now as opposed to then. Time was, you could actually write a letter
-- that's a paper thingie with writing on it, like from a pen -- to your member
of Congress and get a personal reply.
Now, it's mostly form letters, fraudulently signed by auto-pens,
disguised as something Just For You. And
then there's the online nightmare where you can't leave a note until you choose
a category -- and then you generally have to narrow the category down. THEN, if you decide to write a member of
Congress who doesn't represent your district, you're out of luck, unless you
pony (express) up for postage and return to the days of old where you send. . .
a letter. Nevertheless, I've been known
to write those strange and foreign U.S. members of Congress with my views by
lying my ass off in the name and address section on the Web so my extremely
self-important messages would not be rejected.
I often wonder, though, what happens if some miscellaneous congressional
staffer actually responds with a reply mailed to constituent Mr. Chuck Wagonn at
666 Beware St., Cornershadows LA 66666? Well, that's not my problem, is it?
(* Photo from
"The Savage Nation" Web site -- see link to Michael Savage)