Breaking Broken-Down News: The Dems and fellow media accomplices got what they've craved. The Democrats will open an impeachment inquiry against President Trump. That ought to assure his re-election in 2020. Great move, heel-nippers of the left!Glenn Beck goes UFO-ing: There exist people who would rather sniff dog poop for hours than listen to one minute of radio/TV's Glenn Beck. Mostly it's because he's politically conservative, and his being a member of the Church of Latter-Day Saints (formerly known as Mormons) probably turns off a few already-closed minds anyway. Sorry, not every Mormon can be Donny and Marie Osmond, and I don't think Beck even sings.
Aside from friendships with famous mystery/adventure writers and sometimes unnamed celebrities (for their own protection), Beck has taken on the likes of Google, Facebook, Twitter, the deep state and all good and bad (mostly bad, we suspect) things regarding artificial intelligence. But he's evolved further and now samples a path I never expected him to pursue: UFOs.
Not once, but twice Beck has interviewed Luis Elizondo on his radio show, and occasionally breaks into no-nonsense discussions with his broadcast sidekicks about the serious side of the phenomenon. Who saw this coming? Sure, you get this stuff on Coast to Coast A.M., Ground Zero and on plenty of other shows groomed to explore UFOs and such mysteries. But Glenn Beck? We're gratified.
We hope Beck's interest is another turn of the page for a subject craving an inquisitive attitude, and let's hope he continues to put nuggets of truth out there.
On the other hand. . .
What is it with these congressmen, so-called TV journalists and others who can't seem to fathom the established fact that pilot-UFO chases and encounters backed up by visualization and instrumentation are nothing new? How does one make them understand that NO! it's not the Chinese or the Russians or your grandma in a flying machine? Anybody looking at UFO history -- if they bother at all -- will know in short order that apparent high-tech gyrations and speeds were reported decades ago and continued on and on. NICAP.org and Project 1947, as two examples, can educate the uneducated quickly.
Disclaimer Day: Readers should know that, except where it's obvious per the web site itself, I have no knowledge of or interest in the political leanings of people included in my link list. Links are included because they may be of interest to you as they are to me, and I receive no remuneration for posting them. Damn.
Biden & Son: Forget President Trump's (second-hand?) "whistle blower," though the extent of potential disloyalty exhibited here by somebody close (?) to the President might be a story in itself. Detailed allegations regarding Joe Biden and son Hunter's Ukraine adventure, perhaps extending into China, appeared long before now, and the only thing this hyped-up controversy may bring forth will be more lurid details of what is said to be a very sordid affair regarding foreign interference and influence -- and not by Trump. Speaker Nancy Pelosi's demand of Trump to get a transcript of phone conversations is interesting, but even we on the outside would be forced to admit that the Biden-Ukraine-China situation could backfire on the Democrats quickly as investigations continue. In an era when Democrat partisans seem best equipped to repeatedly shoot themselves in the ass with rock salt bullets, we ask. . .should we expect never-ending investigations and truth twists to make Trump look guilty and magically make the Bidens squeaky clean? TV media: Be original -- do your job.
World climate march: First of all, don't bring some Swedish teenage girl to the U.N. and throw her in my face as a climate expert. See the look on her face? Mean-looking, ouch! Too bad that millennials, so screwed up by the education system, are seldom growing the brains to distinguish between sky-is-falling climate fantasies and real science. The trouble is, these swollen populations of young people have been spoon-fed sugared agenda cereal since they were little kids in school. Climate scientists on the "other side" are almost never interviewed or included in any way by the left who control media reporting and education, thus allowing no-nothings to claim a "consensus" regarding human-caused climate change. This consensus of scientists, by the way, does not take into consideration that many on the list are researchers in specialties other than climate.
A babbling, brainwashed, ignorant 16-year-old girl from Sweden, peddling vocalizations suitable for a robot, might better serve the planet by returning to her country and demanding that European leaders take action regarding all the young imported radical Islamic filth currently engaging in a rape fest among innocent young Swedish girls who, apparently, can barely depend upon the police to keep them safe. That's the real human-caused "climate change" affecting the lives of teenage girls in her homeland.
A 9/16 report in the Daily Telegraph references Greta Thunberg, depicting her as a climate activist who, among others, are frightening other teens into an epidemic of climate fear. The implications of a clueless "motor- mouth," obviously, may be incredibly harmful to young people more dependent upon scary bromides than scientific truth.
My wild conjecture: When ABC-TV premieres Emergence this evening some viewing audience members may at least subconsciously associate the young girl apparently at the center of the story with Greta Thunberg simply because of a bad UN-induced taste against screaming youth -- and they won't like her or the series premise. We already suggested the show will be a failure, particularly when folks realize this will just be another ongoing story facing season after season with no ultimate solution until the very last episode, and if the show gets cut short, there may not be a closing episode at all. Better to turn off the TV and stare at your cat all evening. Of course, I could be wrong.
Woke: Strange how those who consider themselves "woke" are actually asleep with dreams devoid of the real.
Taking the crazy way out (wa-a-a-ay-y-y-y-y-y out!): Some Canadian researchers believe that U. S. State Dept. personnel and others who experienced neurological problems in Cuba in 2017 (the "Havana Syndrome) after confrontation with strange electronic-like sounds and other possible percipients had actually encountered pesticides which may have inflicted brain damage. Wha-a-a-a. . .? One wonders, could brain damage also affect those who conjure up such explanations? Could Justin Trudeau's multiple appearances in black face have influenced Canadian researchers in some delayed fashion, causing them to choose pesticides as the culprit after a dart wheel took a fateful spin?
Then again, neatly tying up this package of international gremlins and hoping everything will quietly go away even as alleged victims continue to suffer in silence might not be out of the question for those who pull the strings.
