Zuckerberg's Letter Exposes the Biden Gang's Lies & Intimidation to Jim Jordan

Anybody with eyes wide open, presumably growing in number among those truly interested in facts, is profoundly aware how thoroughly and viciously Americans and the Western World have been mislead by the Biden bunch and the rest of its complicit gang, including the mainstream media (unforgivable!) and various corporate interests in bed with big government.

The long trail of lies about the Covid "vaccine," increasingly suspicious as a contributing factor in illness and death among young people and other formerly healthy people, was kept from us by intent, and even when fully accredited medical personnel attempted to send warnings out over the Internet they were censored far and wide by a system which has no place in America under the First Amendment.  Surely, Jordan realizes the joke our current Dept. of Justice has become, as its alliance appears completely ingrained within the current presidential administration, as opposed to a fair and balanced entity which would not have tolerated these activities.

I could go on and on, but why bother when Meta's Mark Zuckerberg himself wrote a mouthful to Jim Jordan?  Read this letter and you'll begin to get a taste of just how badly we were treated by the Democrats as schools were closed down and commerce was all but destroyed by people on the far left with an agenda which involved keeping the truth from YOU.  From Zuckerberg to the tip of the iceberg, it's all there.

Urinating in the Democrats' Pot of Joy

This was darned nearly perfection in an increasingly imperfect society.  To finish off an agonizing week of televised leftist lies, topped off with Kamala Harris's feel-good speech Thursday evening which evidenced nary a hint of policy specifics, Friday afternoon's arrival of Robert F. Kennedy, Jr's raspy voice resulted in a vocal barrage of harsh words long desperate to be said.  That his family immediately condemned him for daring to make an escape from tattered remnants of what used to be a respectable Democrat Party closely associated with the Kennedys tells us all we need to understand regarding his dedication to other matters, even when he felt it essential to endorse Donald Trump to achieve success.

To my delight, Kennedy actually started out by condemning the Democrats for destroying the very democracy they claim to be saving.  Is this not the heart of the entire matter?

I literally shouted yes!  Yes!  Yes! to the ceiling as RFK used the power of the electronic media to drive his points home.  He wasted no time in attacking mainstream media and the agenda-ridden bed it shares with government and corporations intent upon propagandizing their way into the minds of Americans.  He went right for the throat of his former Democratic Party, calling it corrupt, which lied, censored and punished its way through the Covid months, intimidating us all with "experts" who knew little, reacted with hastily invented rules and regulations and demanded undeserved respect and adherence to what we might designate as medical quackery worn on the other foot.

RFK, Jr. has a reputation for out of the ordinary beliefs and comments (his environmental and energy beliefs concern me, and he certainly has a radical side on other issues with which many disagree), but in an era where the very essence of science itself has been co-opted to serve the desires of leftists and, even more frightening, the global elite, his joining with Donald Trump can only be a good thing.  After Trump's potential election, would RFK, Jr. be given a spot in Health and Human Services or some such?  An ongoing realization that a lot of so-called peer-reviewed scientific studies are bull crap, often written by friends of friends with shady research and review capabilities, may just be the tip of an iceberg in need of a truly technological house-cleaning.  If the outspoken Mr. Kennedy ends up with authority over any health-related agency, perhaps a cherished cabinet post, watch out for fireworks (especially internally).  

While standard childhood immunizations are a proven bonus for a healthy society, the exotic experimentation with mRNA and other laboratory concoctions troubles me and I hope he takes on this issue carefully.    However, RFK's stated goal to get potentially dangerous chemicals out of "processed" food, which may be the cause of multiple illnesses among Americans (other nations forbid such chemical food augmentation) is definitely an emergency which craves urgent attention.  Anybody who doubts a relationship between Big Pharma and Big Food, both of which put chemicals into our bodies every day, is simply naive.

How funny that the Dems spent a week glamorizing their dirty laundry and prettying up their profound failures with celebrity appearances and endorsements (people who have absolutely no idea what it is like to be the rest of us), shrieking about "joy."  And then along comes a Kennedy, the last person in the world expected to do the unthinkable -- and he totally ruins their garden of joyful deception with barbs of utter truth.  Urination for their urine nation.

RFK, Jr. knows all too well what this country faces with the prospect of the new Democrats in charge, for they are nothing like the party he knew throughout his youth.

So uninspiring and clueless was last week's procession of nothingness in Chicago that we almost believe that somewhere there's a giant gambling game going on among the elite, wondering whether the United States hosts enough voters ignorant or stupid enough to let the Harris/Obama gang keep the reigns of socialist power in November.  Should the worst happen, not even a rogue Kennedy can save the USA from the brutality of global authoritarianism.

About My ranting and raving a few days ago (with a few obscenities thrown in at no extra charge to the reader):  Yes, I told England to shove it if they plan to arrest Americans for exercising free speech regarding ill-advised UK leadership.  May I just add, three people were just stabbed to death in Germany by one of those poor, misunderstood, better life-seeking Islamic refugees whom British authoritarian douche bags appear to embrace over their own native citizens.  When, oh when, will the message and the cure get through to ruling British (and German, etc.) heads whilst still attached to their bodies?

The DNC's 3-Point Plan? (Looks Like Socialism, Marxism and Communism)

CHICAGO, August 2024:  Ah, how refreshing, one can almost become nostalgic, literally smelling ghostly odors of things, objects of protest, burning in the streets in the sixties when the Democrats planted their lying asses in, as the song goes, "My kind of town, Chicago is" (NOT).  Me, well I missed all the fun that summer, having spent a few choice weeks in Air Force basic training in Texas (thanks to the Vietnam military draft which, more or less, prodded some of us of draft age and qualifications to enlist for a softer journey into the unknown rather than simply being tossed into it) during LBJ's horrible tenure.  1968 hadn't been totally without other tragedies and excitement before I departed, however, as I had already witnessed TV news reports announcing the shocking  assassinations of both Dr. Martin Luther King and, just days before I left NY for Texas, Sen. Robert F. Kennedy.

So now it's 2024 and there they go again, to invoke some words of President Ronald Reagan, one of the largest organized gangs in the country, coming together like their not quite so vociferous counterparts in the Republican Party, to raise a little hell and money while reading from the leftist script.  Even the union faithful are in attendance (isn't that Shawn Fain of the UAW across the way, the UAW president whose members will be jobless when American car companies are forced to manufacture even more electric cars nobody wants?), as in workers of the world unite!  Except the Teamsters aren't there, as their leadership wisely decided Donald Trump's America First philosophy might just be a little more in keeping with our national identity than the wishes of those who hate or long to continue converting our freedoms into something different entirely.

It's a circus of the bizarre in Chicago this week, but instead of paying a nickel to see a bearded fat lady we behold VP Kamala Harris, not long ago the scourge of her party, incapable of getting enough votes to beat any candidate for any reason. Suddenly, as if by an in-house coup -- which it was -- Joe Biden, solid votes from his delegates notwithstanding, is summarily removed from the next election.  Now it's just peachy for the managed media to report on his family corruption and Hunter -- oh, Hunter, yes, write the truth now and let it all out!  Because?  Because Democrat insiders and higher-ups have chosen panic over reason and selected The Chosen One, an example of the first woman president they hanker to elect -- and one who can also take the sum total of the universal color-arium and proclaim herself black, sort of like Obama-black in political terms.  Hey, it might just work. Bonus:   She was raised among a Marxist family and apparently wants to run the U.S. government with those cherished communist ways.

But before this new leftist hero is properly propped up before the TV cameras and the crowds to officially accept what has already been anointed by people who care nothing whatsoever about giving voters a choice, there must come a vice-presidential candidate -- and ain't Tim Walz a beauty?!  Aside from the veteran thing -- I mean, I'm also a veteran, so I'm not going to dwell -- this guy seems to have quite the appetite for socialism.  After all, as he himself said, one man's socialism is another man's neighborliness.  Until this marvel of a governor came along, I always thought my neighbors were being neighborly out of friendship, but now I see the error of my ways and realize they're just socialists, the lowest of the low.

Seems like the soft communism lock-on is ready to go as speeches and promises rattle out of Chicago this week.  Young clueless voters sucked up by Democrat vacuum cleaners will marvel over the prospect of free home down-payments and even more money to buy that home, while old folks on the verge of leftist-initiated senility will ooh and aah at the prospect of lower drug prices.  Yes, the Democrats will fix all the ills for which they are directly responsible and, no matter what they offer, the bill will still need to be paid by you.

And put your ears to the ground:  Can you hear even one word about deportation of illegal aliens and their illegal children -- the ones costing you billions of dollars without end, paid by taxpayers all over the country?  Is there so much as a murmur about ridding our economy of "anchor babies?"  Crickets, all we usually hear is crickets from the left -- until Democrat playbook puppet Harris come up with a useless program that sounds good but will fail in practice.

Most of her ideas would need to go through Congress, where we would hope a similar vein of stupidity does not dwell after the elections.

Her chant for price controls, as she blames supermarkets and everybody but big government for inflation and the position in which we find ourselves, has never worked anywhere on the planet, yet it is the policy of socialists to insist they can make such things work "this time," though extreme food shortages and a rapid decline in manufactured goods is always the prize for the gullible.

Harris's peculiar speech about shedding us of the past does make sense when one realizes that such obliteration would also necessitate forgetting the success of Donald Trump's policies prior to the invasion of Covid and subsequent Democrat promises to save us by way of closing down essentials like schools and censoring every thought in opposition to their false, party-driven propaganda.  Leaving the past behind would also make us forget Bagram air base in Afghanistan and the billions of dollars of equipment left behind as American soldiers were ambushed to death and thousands of people promised a safe exit were betrayed by the Biden-Harris gang.

Like clockwork, Harris and her bunch suddenly promise "free" money as elections approach, as their big city supporters magically come up with harsh penalties for "smash and grab" crimes.  If tackling these crimes is important now, why wasn't it on the list for the past four years?

If this notorious gang of political liars, all enmeshed with the complicit news and social media and various corporations is your thing, just know that we have finally reached the point where votes will determine the survival or destruction of the United States of America as we currently know it.   At least there's a choice on the menu:  Socialism, Marxism, communism -- or some other special of the day, all the same and doomed to fail. 

One day, mature adults who are young today will need to be the voices of why the United States collapsed into utter communism, should the Harris and Walz team actually win in November.  Today, we truly live in The Last Chance Hotel.

MMMPox:  As our common sense-destitute society continues running away from truth, we now have the world health community (Remember them?  They screwed up everything with Covid) choosing not to call mpox monkey pox because of a perceived racial element!  Um, maybe if nobody would conjure up this incendiary sauce and leave the true and simple designation mpox alone, no problem would exist.  May we suggest that the World Health Organization turn to the now-grown up teenage singing brothers know as Hanson and have them rework their popular song "mmmbop" into "mmmpox" as a public service to remind people of this disease and your concern?  The brothers Hanson belting out "mmmpox" will elicit no more logic or sense than did "mmmbop," but at least the story will be told.  And few will care.

Matthew Perry's death:  Who really killed Matthew Perry?  Matthew Perry killed Matthew Perry.  All it took was money.  The lure of celebrity isn't always what it's cracked up to be in the long run.

Great Britain on Suicide Watch

We have enough trouble here in the states with leftist politicians ravenously kissing the butts of nearly any religion or cult that doesn't have Judeo-Christian roots.

However, the USA shares a thorny problem -- caused almost solely by politicians who blame anybody but themselves -- with Great Britain and other nations:  An epidemic of illegal immigration.  Here, again, in the states we currently observe in real time Democrat Party candidates attempting to reshape history to make themselves the heroes when they are anything but.  Their love of illegal -- that's criminal, to use another word -- immigration and future voters who arrive with the swarms surpasses any aspect of playing fair.

We watched significant parts of American cities burn after the death of drug-addicted, very unhealthy and seemingly death-prone without much provocation -- according to some -- George Floyd at the hands of a police officer, so we're well aware of the damage violent street mobs can accomplish on hair-trigger notice.

But there are other kinds of mobs.  In the UK, right now, mobs of competing political and religious views fight in the streets, while the "authorities" have taken seemingly to defending particularly one side over another in what some call a two-tier justice system.  Where have we heard of a two-tier system before?  Yes, right here in the USA.

England may offer a premonition of what the rest of us will soon taste.  Riots?  Sure, the riots are terrible.  Yet, something far more dangerous to everybody lurks in the background, in the courts and in the very seat of Great Britain's once venerable justice system: The demand to silence free speech, thus making one's opinion either in writing or voice subject to arrest, hefty fines and extensive prison time.  This, mind you, is no longer the jolly old England currently squashing its own people's right to speak out against evil.  It's something else entirely.  Who calls for violence as opposed to those who merely speak their minds about it?

Great Britain has been so overwhelmed with migrants from Islamic and, as Trump would say, sh**hole countries that the Crown itself is in jeopardy of falling to radical Islam in the near future, and native-born British subjects are not taking this prospect well.  In fact, they are scared to death and should be, as they watch women, little children, police officers, military members and just about anybody on the street become instantly subject to rapes, stabbings, murders and mutilations by foreign people who know and care nothing about English law and tradition.

The "authorities" appear to do little except arrest citizens who protest the monster, and invariably it is the citizen who pays the price in the courts.  The people are rising up because their so-called leaders seem not to be concerned about a pending social disaster and they, quite rightly, are in utter fear for their lives.

Well, perhaps England's practitioners of justice would care if they weren't, by now, on the way to becoming fragmented to pieces by the growing horror allowed to invade their country.  Like rats without borders, the uninvited migrants and their offspring come, not merely for a better life, but to bring the rat feces of extremist Islam to devour the host and help construct a new era to control the masses of whomever is left alive or absolutely subservient to the teachings of he, the ancient child molester who truly does look most genuine when artists draw his picture with a bomb secured in his turban -- he whose facial depiction is never to be drawn because it is blasphemous to do so.  He whose very name destroys the alphabetical character "M" as if it has been pooped upon by a flea-ridden pigeon.

Far easier it is to arrest citizens than to go after rats who will strike back a hundred times in a thousand ways, when English cities and towns will burn.  Quaintness and charm become the ashes punished by the unforgiving rage of masses without allegiance to a government they will never, NEVER recognize or serve.

As an American, what bothers me this week is to discover that there are members of England's current authority class (the one in existence before extremists conquer them) who want not only to shut up members of their own society who speak out about the evil in their midst, but who also want to hold Americans liable for bringing up the topic as well!  What?!?!

First, I hope that England's best, interested acutely in saving national culture from the nouveau black plague, continue to fight like hell because few in your government seems to be in your corner, from my distant observation, as they continue to imprison and fine people merely for speaking or writing about impending doom on the doorstep.  Not that we don't have this stupidity in the states.

Second, a word to you sons of bitches hiding behind the Crown and the courts and longing to come after Americans speaking out about the rot consuming your, and perhaps soon enough, my own country:  You are spineless, gutless and dangerous to your own citizens, and if you don't collectively grow a pair and take up a collection of testosterone very soon your own heads will be rolling down the streets of your country, its traditions and history obliterated to make way for the return to a dark age which never should have found its way back to an at least somewhat civilized society.

As a small, relatively obscure blogger, I may not be exactly what some British authorities have in mind, but I've certainly no interest in accommodating the censors or speech police, and all of them can just go to hell with tea and crumpets shoved up their ass at the base of Big Ben at noon. We Americans, to remind you of the past, left England long ago to shed exactly the kind of threats and authoritarian intimidation the Crown exerted upon people yearning to be free of it.  As a military veteran, I've little patience by now to be warned by the likes of gutless judicial administrators in the UK or anywhere who excel at shutting people up instead of going after the causes of why certain things happen.  Fuck you all.

Now, to those of you who are proudly British (or citizens of pretty much any Western European nation, who themselves watch in fear as authorities turn on their own people), go save your country without violent means, and may U.S. elections this year bring in somebody with the courage to scrub away the invading Third World scum and those who allowed this outrage to happen, wherever they hide -- and a good lot of these scoundrels shouldn't be too difficult to find once justice becomes sane and equal for all once again.

Words, Just Words

As the week concludes with remnants of a nasty hurricane destroying dreams and drenching places seldom subject to hurricanes, we leave today only these.  We also hope voters in the USA will come to realize the inherent evil overwhelming what used to be known as the Democratic Party.  If you crave global control and Marxism in every corner, the current candidate sideshow is for you.  But what do I know, I'm just an old (very old) blogger.

Now, a Litany of Words From Our Sponsors

Before we dive into today's subject, I should note that during a random but unsuccessful online search for anything that might possibly be known as the National Association of White Journalists, darned if I didn't discover instead a group with an almost identical name, except. . .well, it was called the National Association of Black Journalists.  Imagine that, what a coincidence!

Well, anyway, soon thereafter, TV news shows made a Big Deal out of Donald Trump being interviewed -- rudely, as it turned out -- by an ABC-TV reporter whom I have long believed is named Rachel Snot.  For as long as Trump occupied the presidential and post-presidential political scene, I had watched Snot's pout-faced stories on ABC-TV News, her facial expression almost always betraying her true feelings when the topic of Trump surfaced.

Therefore, it was no surprise that Trump's entrance couldn't even elicit a greeting from Snot, as she slipped right into hardcore question mode. So harsh and uninviting were her cold interrogation words, in fact, that at least one other journalist later scolded her, and people online even responded with threats of personal harm.  That certainly isn't cool.

But enough frivolity. I'm sure the National Association of Black Journalists will clear this up soon, as Ms. Snot appears to be one of theirs. Now, on to. . .

Oh, and the Olympics:  Do you watch those silly things?  I haven't been, as this affair is something I will always skip if given a choice between it and running my hands through a box of used kitty litter.  Nevertheless, that little incident about a woman being beaten -- literally -- by a man pretending to be a woman during a brief boxing match was disturbing.  Until women rise up in numbers and until science and common sense get a renewed foothold in society and its classrooms, this kind of outrage will repeat itself in multiple ways.

Watch this or else:  As a child in the 1950s, I still remember those old TV shows, generally half-hour displays incorporating horse operas, family situations and comedy.  Some went on for an hour, but they were rare.  In any event, there were routinely shows named after their sponsors, such as the Armstrong Circle Theater; there was Texaco gasoline which brought us Milton Berle; Alcoa Aluminum brought us the strange (for its time) "One Step Beyond."

TV and radio commercials back then were appreciated (and sometimes informative) because they were few in number during an hour and almost never seemed intrusive.

That was then.

Today, what do we have?  We are subjected to frequent basket-loads of commercials which last almost as long as the brief segments of original programming waved in front of our faces.  Meanwhile, we are reminded that commercials pay the bills, lest we would have no programs to watch or hear.

With the growth of Internet entertainment, TV and radio often struggle to remain relevant, though, fortunate for them, the sad collapse of newspapers around the country has simultaneously shuffled essential ad revenue to the broadcast media.

Still, all is tenuous.  TV stations and suppliers reliant upon old TV westerns, dramas, comedies and motion pictures have done about all they can to cut, slice and mutilate the work of talented writers, producers and directors in order to make room for the advertising dollar, and the effects are visually brutal on the TV screen.  As never before, crucial events and scenes are interrupted and commercials appear so fast that the viewer almost believes they are part of the plot.  Of course, this stems from the years when viewers could purchase devices to record their favorite shows with all commercials deleted, thanks to an ability for the machines to recognize pauses between programs and commercials.

Today, the wrestling match goes on among the need for networks and stations to pay the bills. the profit motive and how to keep viewers or listeners in the chair or on the sofa, and for the viewership results are ugly.  The number and depth of commercials dominating every program is out of control, and the traditional audience is on the decline.  Streaming, that great white hope of the alternative entertainment industry, is starting to crack, perhaps on the way to joining the problem list of traditional media.

Me?  If I see or hear a commercial appealing to my needs or wants, I'll scour other sources to buy the product -- which is quite possibly cheaper and better than the version advertised.  Why?  Because competitors aren't spending tons of money buying sponsor time and they therefore probably pay their employees better to concentrate on a more reliable product.  When I find a cheaper and better product, I haven't been averse to contacting the TV or radio sponsor of the advertised product and letting them know.

The media consumer is the only one who can tame the wild commercial beast, if this is even possible, and you do it by complaining to the sponsors and TV or radio stations, and by purchasing advertised products from somebody else.  A terrible solution for many, yes - but what other power have we?  Broadcast institutions need to find a way to sort through this plethora of mind-numbing commercials, many of which one can't remember or care about anyway, without killing their Golden Goose.