Wednesday, March 11, 2026

What's Cooking? (Your Brain)

I'm grateful that CBS-TV's "60 Minutes" remains on the U.S. government personnel brain-injury issue in which possible microwave (?) devices invented and assembled by a foreign enemy may indeed be a real concern.  It's just a shame that our American government has been so slow to admit what may be categorized, as was brought up on the program, an act of war against the United States by way of this instrumentation directed by foreign agents. Is Dr. Russia in the house?

As I have written in the past that some close encounters with UFOs may have involved ultrasonics, a theory I developed while working with therapeutic ultrasound equipment in the Air Force in the sixties, I simultaneously treated patients with microwave and shortwave energy and wondered about this application -- but instead concentrated upon the ultrasound aspect.  As years have elapsed, I believe microwave energy may also be acceptable as a UFO encounter side-effect (refer to James M. McCampbell and his book, Ufology).  Then again, we may be dealing with a form of immense energy about which we really have no working hypothesis.

Nevertheless, we hope "60 Minutes" continues to champion instances of government personnel who seem overwhelmingly to have suffered bizarre energy wave attacks.  There comes a point, unless you're in a communist country where throwing a psychiatrist or team of psychologists in the mix to quell legitimate concerns, simply doesn't make sense, and the propaganda boys and girls have no place left to piss away the truth.

Trump and everything else:  He apparently has a long-term plan to make the Western hemisphere safe for the U.S. and our willing neighbors, and if Cuba goes down as did Venezuela, as we watch Iran sway like a tree with rotted roots, a remarkably different future may be in store.  We wish Canada's Mark Carney would get a giant dose of common sense as he plays footsie with China's take-all business sense, and if Mexico could shed its drug empire . . . well, just imagine.

Meanwhile, the worthless American Democrats continue holding Homeland Security hostage (no funding) and kissing radical Islam butt (hello, New York City) -- that is, the religious crazies who insist on killing all Jews and everybody in the West who won't submit to their religion. Isn't it absurd to concentrate on "hate speech" words when the real haters want to murder others with viable weapons?  Does anybody believe the two terrorists who threw an unexploded device into a crowd over the weekend in NY were just joking?!

Regarding I.C.E. -- go get 'em, guys!  What do I want?  I want the estate of the late Alex Pretti charged for the tail light he kicked off a government vehicle my taxes paid for during his first assault on law enforcement.  By the way -- if he was an ER nurse at a VA facility, wasn't he therefore a federal government employee who maybe should not have been doing the protest things he was doing?  I don't know his status or the rules, just suggesting. 

Wednesday, March 4, 2026

Ayatollah in a Hole-Ah


A fond farewell to the not-so-supreme leader of Iran and everybody who formerly surrounded his commanding evil presence.  Rest not in peace, but in pieces (lots of pieces) y'all.

Several times over the years I have mentioned two young Iranian women with whom I attended medical classes when I was in Air Force training in 1968, but maybe my best recollection occurred in my posting from 2025.  The photo showing them and the rest of us appears below and in the entry here:   https://robert-barrow.blogspot.com/2025/06/before-infestation-decade-before.html

 


 

Thursday, February 26, 2026

Silencers in the Shadows

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You may have noticed the deletion of my first February blog posting showing this visual,

and I was as surprised as my readers when the posting disappeared.  However, it did not merely disappear-- it was taken down by that entity known as "The Blogger Team."

In order to appeal a deleted post, Blogger provides a peculiar, if not arduous e-mail address which I am unable to access no matter how I organize it or break into sections.  Because I seem unable to connect with this nebulous entity known as The Blogger Team, I will print below for everyone the response I intended for those who consider appeals.  Maybe they will see this, maybe they won't, but you will and this will explain what happened:

To The Blogger Team:


This is in response to Blogger removing my post, "Bits and Pieces for February 2026" from my blog, robert-barrow.blogspot.com.  This is reportedly a "hate speech" issue, but your generic note offers no specifics.

For nearly 20 years I have posted two blogs on Blogger and never received even one complaint, and all e-mails in response have been positive and inquisitive.  If someone had a problem with the post in question they could easily have contacted me, as my e-mail address is clearly available and my name is real.  From where I stand, anonymous complaints leading to consequences for one's literary style could be looked upon as the ultimate in intolerance.

My deleted posting is not out of character with years of previous entries, and I feel it entirely fair to comment on people, places and events in the news.  I do not write "hate speech," which is a very easy term to define and manipulate by those who themselves wish to condemn another's freedom to comment on newsworthy topics.  If my entry or any of my entries were "hate speech" it seems I would have invoked some agenda to inflict physical harm, murder or incite violence -- when, to be honest, some of my words actually reference those who themselves might have some relationship to those ideas.  If I was deleted purely because of my commentary, my personal thoughts, this is in my opinion a very problematic approach and dangerous to any person's or group's freedom of expression.  If my words are emotionally hurtful to somebody, there is no cure for that, for there are people in this world who will cry and fuss over the mere thought of rain spoiling a sunny day, while others delight in knowing rain will make flowers grow and thrive.

Having reviewed my post and knowing no specifics of the problem, it is impossible for me to address the reason for deletion.  To take down an entire post because of a point of contention does not serve the reading community, except perhaps those with some agenda contrary to  words written.  In another sense, if I "ruffled feathers" among my readers my writing has performed a valuable service, and to either agree or disagree is one's right.  But to censor and remove the ability of others to understand a writer's perspective is just wrong.

I suspect this action could have only a single person or group representative complaining, quite possibly some entity outside the USA (where I reside), but of course I don't know.  However, I have been a writer for decades and my writing has appeared in newspapers, national magazines and now blogs (from which I derive and seek no financial gain, by the way), and I have never experienced a problem.  Yes, my words can be humorous, ironic, irreverent, absurd, fictitious, sarcastic, satirical, annoying, flippant, harsh, critical and inescapably offensive to one's personal beliefs -- and intent upon making readers actually think about a variety of issues, including names and topics very much newsworthy and ripe for commentary.  I am not a Nazi or some supremacist out for blood.  I am not reporting news as a member of the press, but I am offering personal commentary, measured condemnation and impressions, abundantly clear to readers who freely agree or disagree without resorting to censorship.  If I wrote something subject to possible litigation involving Blogger or myself, that would be worthy of alert, but I see no such application in my deleted post.

If this comes down to perhaps a single person or organized group with opposing political views painting me as a perpetrator of so-called hate speech and can't handle views opposite to their own, I would suggest they discontinue reading my blog and go elsewhere so my otherwise faithful readership may continue enjoying freedom of (not hate) speech.  Am I now in the position of needing to "watch my back" every time I post an entry, especially because it is ever so easy for anyone to arbitrarily click on a flagging icon due to my having somehow shattered their personal senses? "Hate speech" finger-pointing seems an exceptionally dangerous and nebulous path to follow in a world begging for a variety of thoughts to counter elitist dogma and extremist national policy or to just provide alternative ideas.

As Blogger appears to serve as a platform for diverse postings and discussion, I request that you reconsider and please either re-post my February blog entry or give me permission to do so.  I look forward to your reply.  Thank you.  

Robert Barrow   robert-barrow.blogspot.com
                             ufothemovie.blogspot.com


Blogger's printed guidelines state the following regarding "hate speech" issues:  

"Hate speech is content that promotes or condones violence against or has the primary purpose of inciting hatred against an individual or group on the basis of their race or ethnic origin, religion, disability, age, nationality, veteran status, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, or any other characteristic that is associated with systemic discrimination or marginalization."

Well, that certainly covers everybody who exercises thought.

But who knows how this decision came to be?  My generic e-mail from Blogger was essentially a form letter with no reference whatsoever to my wandering indiscretion, though wrapped in a likewise generic warning that if I continued with hate speech my blog may be removed entirely!?!  Was my blog entry removal initiated by a bot?  More likely, I wonder if the force behind reporting my "hate speech" is some emotionally or sexually unfulfilled human with little to no influence elsewhere who delights in going from blog to blog and flagging the opinions of others in order to gain, I don't know, some weird power play or neurotic high to complement their apparently miserable, humorless and worthless lives.  A member of the crazed far left perhaps? Frankly, I am curious whether such people who feel it their duty to insist upon censoring the words expressed by others are even able to write a coherent paragraph themselves.

Blogger is owned by Google and Google owns the world or maybe wants to, I guess, but of course they have their standards with which I vehemently disagree and my disagreement means nothing to those who run this circus.  

I cannot speak to Blogger Team folk who employ their established standards, but I can address my readers as follows: 

I am probably several decades older than many of you, am a wartime veteran who experienced a few things in life, and I say to one and all that if our society continues ratcheting up on this often contrived "hate speech" monstrosity and its increasing number of definitions the future will be bleak, leaving everybody less and less opportunities to express their own opinions.  Others will be silenced far worse than I have been silenced by the removal of one blog entry (with perhaps more on the way until I am shut out entirely).  

The implementation of "hate speech" to suppress and replace free thought with politically favored dogma is also currently a weapon of choice among tyrants wanting to control the West, and favored among the world's Elite who demand no rights for anybody but themselves.  Frequently, "hate speech" appears merely an abbreviated form of the sentence, I (or we) hate your freedom to say or write your thoughts.  

Hate speech, you see, is the fearsome two-word accusatory war weapon which can easily be deployed by those with an agenda to destroy an entire society or culture without the firing of a single gunshot.

Thursday, February 19, 2026

On Hold as the Moment Evolves


To my readers:  I want to resume posting soon, but a blogging issue of some importance has surfaced which must be addressed first.  As somebody once suggested, the future isn't what it used to be :):) -- Robert

Wednesday, January 21, 2026

Fouling the Nest with a Cornucopia of Intentions (plus -- I Want Denmark)

Give Me Denmark at Once!  As a kid in grade school more years ago than I care to remember, I and the other students were assigned a project in which each would mail a nickel or dime to a particular member of the United Nations in NY City.  I was assigned Denmark, and obediently secured my nickel or dime (I don't recall which denomination) and sent it off in an envelope at the post office to "Delegate from Denmark," whoever that nameless person happened to be.  The accompanying letter requested that the delegate mail me back with a coin from his or her own country.

Well, you can just imagine what happened.  That son of a pup kept my coin and responded with nothing, not even a thank you for the funding I obviously provided toward the next drink at the bar, or maybe even for a low-rent hooker!

Now that President Trump is on the move toward acquiring Greenland over Denmark's objections, I say please, Mr. President, I WANT DENMARK!  They owe me, and no matter what happened to my money I'm sure the interest involved by now would make me a millionaire!  Or something.  Anyway, if I can't actually hold those thieving Danish bastards responsible, maybe I could borrow Greenland for a while?  You know, that island where the people wear caps that read MAGA:  Make America Greenland Again?  I promise to take good care of the place, Mr. Trump, and once I dig up about a nickel or dime's worth plus interest of rare earth minerals you can have it back.  By the way, there's no hurry.


There was that long-sustainable era until just years ago when newspapers and their great reporters who knew how to write effectively and tell stories demanding to be told enjoyed the luxury of seemingly endless column space unrestrained by time or sound bites.  Often, newspaper journalists could focus almost overnight and in depth on the benefits, problems or blatant illegalities involved with one subject or another.  When that nebulous thing known as the environment became newspaper fodder, yes, there existed reporters, editors and publishers who happily tackled the crazy, scare-you-out-of-your-pants aspects to sell papers.  

When "group think" invaded the newspaper industry in a hopeless attempt to stay relevant and profitable -- as readers started to divert their attention to the electronic brain-shriveling creature called the Internet -- the writing was on the wall. And on the digital chip.  No longer did people capable of merely pushing buttons need to plan their days or their very lives or even decide what to feed the cat because The Screen satisfied their every curiosity. Truth, lies, damned lies and glittering pretend food to feed both starving and stupid brains.  Real local, national and international news?  Well, multiple versions were readily available on The Screen, and the Internet user could know "everything" with a little scrolling in just seconds.  Not to forget -- just as the VCR became popular overnight primarily because one could finally access the greatest "pornography" (I think that means showing us as we really are) on the planet, the Web suddenly took over as the best sex machine aside from rubber inflatables and battery-operated devices ever known to man, woman or beast.

But I digress, don't I?  The point is, newspaper reporters of old, much of their literary offspring now confined to magazines sold haphazardly on invisible newsstands and on grocery store shelves, spared nothing to alert communities to both the good and bad.  RIP, the daily local newspaper as it continues a sad decline.

Newspapers of somewhat older times were superb at providing details about the construction of a new school or mall, or the benefits or consequences of actions provided by land developers.  Mind you, these were occasions where only a few acres were involved, an era when a young couple might buy an acre or two upon which to build their dream home -- or perhaps a new factory or small business came into town, gobbling up a small amount of land.

But yes, change comes a knocking, like it or not.  Small becomes bigger, simple becomes complex, national security becomes ever more paramount and the natural world collapses a little more as people who should care about such things instead bury their heads in sports or other innocuous time and flatulence-passers of no value to our existence as humans.

To Clay, New York has come a supposed miracle of digital chip technology, a 20-year plan by the Micron Technology corporation to build, if we understand this correctly, a four-part semiconductor manufacturing campus, each part the size of 10 football fields, eventually incorporating some 7.2 million square feet of space.  Billions and billions of dollars are involved in the construction, and the kick-off of actual chip production is intended for four years from now.  50,000 jobs in the short-term seem to be required for construction and operations alone.

Indeed, a ground-breaking ceremony took place just days ago, and in attendance to break ground with individual shovels of soil were the usual dignitaries, including U.S. and state senators always up for a good photo op.  

The new reality has come to town.  Instead of a house or two, or a hardware store and a pharmacy putting in roots, the current choice continues to involve enlisting scores of bulldozers and a myriad of other heavy equipment to clear-cut tens or hundreds or thousands of acres of land.  No longer is a farm, a meadow or a babbling brook looked upon as a gem to cherish and leave untouched, but rather a commodity to wipe out and transform as easily as erasing words from a blackboard, altered forever.  The animals?  As always, they can go "somewhere else."  The wild berries, the fragrant wildflowers, fruit trees of all manner must go because of progress.

The ruling class in Central New York and, of course, its frequently accommodating broadcast media love the concept of Micron's arrival.  Thousands of jobs will come at last in an area longing for steady employment.  It's funny, though. Micron is building in an area known as White Pine Commerce Park, and of course white pines will be among the plethora of trees soon to disappear in exchange for pavement, blacktop and modern buildings serving the chip and AI industry.  On the bright side, skyscrapers apparently occupy no space in the sprawl.

I'm not taking this opportunity to complain about this Goliath project, as we humans are what we are and we will always do what we do.  The dilemma is that we always take and seldom give back, in the sense that everything we accomplish is for our benefit and the rest of that which nurtures us, ours and theirs is usually moved away, crushed or killed into powder and generally forgotten about in terms of future importance.

As far as Micron's sprawling presence goes -- what if, say, in three to five or six years people suddenly have the ability to produce chips, tons of them, in the comfort of their own homes?  Further, don't discount the very real possibility that robotics will assume all production duties flawlessly.  As we already worry with the rise of artificial intelligence, who needs humans for jobs in the years ahead and how many?  What would become of the mega-campus?

Of what value will the semiconductor chips of Micron or any chip manufacturer be if (when?) we experience another "Carrington Effect" of the 1800s, when the sun vomited the mother of all EMP (electromagnetic pulsation) energy directly toward our atmospherically protected, yet incredibly vulnerable planet, causing telegraph lines and office telegraph equipment to go up on flames?  Planet-wide, effective shielding from such cosmic incursions upon modern electrical living is pathetically lacking  -- especially, remarkably, in the USA.

So, like many sprawling chip plants across the globe, Micron will materialize.  An abundant and essential clean water supply will be sucked into this new neighbor industry by millions of gallons a week, used and then discarded as dirty water.  Local residents are assured that this can be managed with high tech.  Can't everything?  Along with these mega-structures, extensive housing will be required for those who build and for those who work in the facility.  This will require the vast sale of farms, forests, meadows and other areas of natural beauty and pure environmental importance for tens if not hundreds of miles around.  Along with Micron will come a myriad of supporting businesses and structures, thereby requiring even more bulldozing, pavement, blacktop and obliteration of things natural and good.  By the time these thousands of new workers make their homes where they have access to Micron and other businesses, spending their free time having night after night of wild recreational or child-producing sex on mattresses sold by novel mattress and bed companies, the new hell is loaded and ready to go.  Eventually, perhaps doomed kids born in this arena, battling for a paucity of good jobs as they mature, once entitled to growing up with nature and natural processes assisting in showing them who they are, will instead be condemned to pavement, blacktop, few LOCAL grass or forest areas and a life structured by AI, restrictive laws and almost literally no place to go, no place to run.  Unless one's idea of a good time is to become the Singularity.  And don't expect that a so-called neighborhood park or two developed by some nebulous planning board will take the place of what was previously real and vital just yesterday.  Pollution and crime as babysitters?  We shall see.  

The three-alarm fire sale grab and makeover of gigantic tracts of at least moderately unblemished land tempered until now is about to explode with crucial decisions routinely determined by both the elite and the well paid-off who wield the keys, and as is customary there will be shouts of "Jobs Jobs Jobs!" along with the hoary mantra, "People have to live somewhere!"  Whose somewhere?  What somewhere?  What happens to creatures whom we are not?  

Really, I detest whacked-out members of the crazy environmental class as much as anybody, but this time much seems so different, so jeopardized.  Are we fine-tuned enough to administer caution as new ventures of monstrous size emerge from blueprints all over the country?

We were warned years ago about what has already come and what is scheduled to invade our living space in such books as, The Last Child in the Woods, which should be read by anybody intent upon anticipation of a secure future with children in tow -- though by now we suggest that we have seen the future.  For most of us, sadly, there may be no particularly desirable room at that nearby inn as both AI and the ultra-huge take charge.  Just saying. . .