Tuesday, September 8, 2020

This, That and Robert's Courtroom

Trump on Veterans:  I don't care what he is alleged to have said about veterans, and by now I tend to doubt most media "blockbusters" (they did it to themselves) because there are obviously people "out there" poised to destroy him just in time for the elections.  As a Vietnam Era veteran let me say, I care about what this President does, not what he may or may not have said.  This is all bullsh** for the Democrats to eat up, and bullsh** particularly from "anonymous sources" is their favorite meal.

Something against Trump? From The Atlantic?  Really?  What a surprise.  Just sit back and watch a snowstorm of anti-Trump books and magazine articles hit the streets as November edges closer.  Few will offer reasonable alternatives which don't point hard left.

Be it Resolved:  Polls are Everything.  Except -- remember four years ago when election possibilities appeared entirely bleak for Donald Trump, according to numerous respected polls and pollsters?  The usual suspects among media watchdogs are playing the same game all over again.  Are American voters really unaware or naive enough to choose radical Marxism and a deflating old career politician over the choices we are allowed to make more freely under Trump?

Black Lives Matter:  Just what is the large corporate-style entity known as Black Lives Matter doing with millions of dollars donated, sometimes probably under emotional duress, by American businesses and individuals?

Street "protesters" enjoy warm weather:  Not only that, but a number of governors and mayors seem perfectly delighted by their presence.  We admire and treasure the intellect and judgement of noted black Americans such as Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and Dr. Benjamin Carson, but have little regard for street trash of color or of no color currently pleasuring themselves daily and nightly by causing havoc and putting lives and property at risk.  In an era when opportunity has never been more within reach for black people in this country (and there was this sort of a black President, as I recall. . .), it is astounding that the masses prefer to remain ignorant, stupid and infatuated with common street thugs who happen to have unfortunate encounters (often self-assisted) with a teeny-tiny percentage of police officers.  This is the precipitant which causes readily-assembled mobs to burn, loot and acquire instant free TVs and hair products from trashed stores?

Robert's Courtroom Convenes and is Now in Session.  Robert ("I ain't no judge") is not an attorney, has ongoing legal issues about when he should even change his socks, but feels that if one can serve as one's own attorney in court, he should certainly be allowed to take on an adjudication role after serving as his own grand jury.  Thus. . .

Case #1:  Jacob Blake of Kenosha, WI:  Allegedly paralyzed due to police gunshots.  Did he resist the police?  Did he fail to surrender even when a Taser was employed?  Did he continue walking away from the cops, toward his car, despite orders to stop?  Did he open the door and lean in, blatantly giving the impression of perhaps reaching for a weapon?  Was there not a knife discovered in the vehicle within reach of Mr. Blake?  Did Mr. Blake also have a knife on his person during the encounter with police?  Were there previous warrants or statements regarding Mr. Blake and sexual violations, such as unwanted sexual encounters at periodic intervals with a woman which involved breaking into a home and sexually violating her in a bed as her child or children lay next to her?

The Verdict:  If even half of this is true, CASE IS DISMISSED against the named police officers of Kenosha.

Case #2:  Daniel Prude, Rochester, NY:  Deceased.  He was just "visiting," we are told.  Did he not walk down the street naked?  Was he not on at least one drug, allegedly PCP?  Did the drug and/or his own mental state cause him to spit at everybody around him, especially the police officers trying to contain him in his frenzied condition, thus necessitating the application of a spit hood over his head to protect those around him from potential infections?  Did police not act by the book in trying to keep him and the public safe?  Is his family taking to the streets and media, blaming cops when they apparently did little to control his actions?  In fact, were the police not called because somebody needed to control this wildly out-of-control man?  Did he not have his own intriguing criminal record?

The Verdict:  If even one street drug was involved, causing this person to be a threat to both himself and others, CASE DISMISSED.

Case #3:  George Floyd:  Did illicit drug use ultimately cause his death, as opposed to what rabid cop-hating media sources have been spitting out (if anybody needs a spit hood, it's the activist media)?  Not murder by police after all?  Keep an eye on this one.

The Verdict:  Too close to call, but possibly not as cut-and-dried as we were led by the nose to believe.  We'll see.

The street mobs need to blame President Trump and the police for everything going wrong in their self-engineered, pathetic lives.  Is that all they got?  Obviously.

It's not a lack of reparations, baby -- it's a fundamental absence of critical thinking.  Brain Lives Matter.  Try using 'em sometime.