Thursday, June 30, 2022

BIZARRE Doesn't Begin to Cover This UFO Science Aspect


Were I a theoretical physicist,
and I'm clearly not, right now I think I would be spinning in my grave -- and I'm not even dead.

If THAT makes no sense, then I hope you had an opportunity to check out reporter George Knapp's interview for Las Vegas' KLAS-TV (Nexstar Media), portions posted online 6-24-2022, with Dr. Travis Taylor.  Therein lies a he-said-what? moment.

Taylor, another recent "celeb" of sorts in UFO circles because he was "hiding in plain sight" as part of the UAP Task Force analyzing the Gimbal and Tic-Tac videos, has allegedly discovered some very strange properties about the objects recorded.

Following up on Knapp's question about why photographic representations of UAPs (by the way, I will continue to dismiss this term, which to me seems like bureaucracy's way of obliterating all the decades of "told you so" and extraordinary documentation planted by credible private researchers who carried the UFO designation on to its current status) are often fuzzy, Taylor actually offers an incredible response.

To encapsulate on Taylor's revelations, high-tech instrumentation analyzing these particular UAPs finds objects with an internal part hot enough to melt metal, yet inexplicably surrounded by a layer of cool air -- apparently causing a bubble or some kind of field between what the cameras pick up and record vs. human eye observations.  Complicating the mystery, referencing especially the famous Puerto Rico encounter where a small object raced through the skies and then entered the ocean without causing ANY break in the water, nor precipitating a wake as it cruised effortlessly through the water without any evidence of propulsion -- and lack of propulsion rivals Taylor's findings when Tic Tac and Gimbal UAPs soar through the sky -- it occurs to me as just a li'l old writer and UFO researcher since the 1950s that maybe we humans don't have and may NEVER have advanced enough scientific equipment able to tell us what's going on with this phenomenon / phenomena / phefoomenon / feefumenon or whatever unhelpful words we come up with to semi-satisfy our curiosity.

As far as Knapp, Taylor and all of this goes, hell, I don't know what to believe, for the UFO arena, like so many other patches of activity on the planet, constantly rotates and sheds real, unreal and questionable particles of stuff every day.  Maybe I'd rather be sleeping.  

Will our science advance fast enough to interpret something's, or somebody else's science in the time remaining for our species on Earth?  Or will we just be the next mastodon who knows nothing beyond the vegetation it's eating as it perishes in a flash during mid-swallow?