It warmed my senses (even the ones we haven't discovered yet) and cold heart to watch the House of Representatives conduct the first -- public -- UFO inquiry in some 50 years. Oops, make that UAP. No, wait, dammit, why change the name of an old horse? You'll always be a UFO to me, darlin'.
Thing is, and we can appreciate the national security angle to some degree, we the peeps weren't invited to the closed-door session held thereafter.
We fervently hope and expect, following a public airing regarding and showing thingies in the sky and underwater, that once the closed session began more mentally excruciating attention was focused upon reports of UFOs visiting military nuclear weapons bases and allegedly exercising an ability to either temporarily disable nukes or mess with firing code numbers. That selection didn't seem to rattle as many cages as one might desire in the open hearing.
Maybe, too, in the closed session somebody brought up decades of apparent electromagnetic and other effects showered upon man, woman and machine during some UFO/UAP encounters?
Oh, and dear congressional reps, if you would -- I know some folks are loathe to associate the UFO abduction phenomenon with video, hardware and instrumentation aspects -- but the curious are still waiting for a reasonable explanation to account for the alleged Hickson-Parker abduction in Pascagoula in the seventies. There were witnesses. . .and more. If some in Congress quake behind closed doors at the possibilities displayed before them last Tuesday, implications regarding the Pascagoula incident should rightly raise eyebrows in the House even higher.
Etc., etc.
